Posts Tagged ‘sperm count’
Sunday, July 18th, 2010
And you thought this was old...
What do you own that is 600 million years old? Your old suit? That little league baseball glove? Your cologne? In fact, every man possesses something that old, and believe it or not, it’s a gene. Not the clothing kind, but the kind you keep in your genome, in your chromosomes. We’ve talked about the Y chromosome in this space but lets take a moment to focus on a single tiny gene.
Tucked away in every cell of your body is a gene called Boule, a piece of DNA critical for sperm production. A colleague of mine just announced that the Boule gene is present in every organism from insects like fruit flies, to sea urchins, roosters, fish and man. It is in invertebrates and vertebrates alike. That is, this tiny bit of DNA has remained essential for making sperm through 600 million years of evolution. Surely the oldest treasure you own.
But what’s really impressive about the Boule gene is that is has not changed over time. And change is the rule with every other known gene involved with reproduction in every species. In fact, evolution of reproductive traits is how a species diverges from other species. It gives each species its identity. And this change can be very rapid: in some fish, reproductive traits are observed to change in fewer than a dozen generations. So why would this one gene stay the same?
We think that the Boule gene has remained true over 600 million years because it is essential for reproduction. Boule is a “quality control” gene that ensures all goes well as sperm are made. Just as you would want your new car to be well inspected so it is safe to drive when you buy it, you want your sperm to be reproductively fit. In fact, if the Boule gene is removed, sperm production stops entirely. Not a single sperm is made in its absence. Now that’s control.
What’s also impressive about the Boule gene is that since it is linked to sperm production, it means that sperm are very, very ancient cells. Seems that nature sticks with what is tried and true and feels no need to experiment with magic potions or fairy dust to get the job done. Reminds me of what Einstein once said while reflecting on relativity and physics: “God does not play dice.” When it comes to reproduction, the Boule gene phenomenon suggests that he may take even fewer chances.
Tags: azoospermia, conception, fertility, fertility preservation, fertility restoration, male infertility, men's health, reproduction, sexual health, sperm, sperm count, stem cells, testicle, testosterone
Posted in male infertility, men's health, sexual health | No Comments »
Sunday, June 20th, 2010
The spine: OK for shivers and tingling, but that's it.
I have a lot of patients in my practice who have broken their backs. Not figuratively by working so hard, but literally, by having spinal cord injuries. Some have been crushed by rolling logs, fallen from tall heights, been victims of shooting, dived into shallow pools or took an untoward jump while skiing or skateboarding. As a group, these men are impressive: imbibed with fortitude, perseverance, decisiveness and joie de vivre, they take nothing in life for granted. Live it hard, wring it dry, no regrets.
Their numbers are not insignificant either. Roughly 5,000-10,000 individuals experience spinal cord injury annually in the U.S. alone. And although you may think that cars have plenty of safety measures, they don’t, as the biggest cause of cord injury is motor vehicle accidents. Violence, recreational activities and workplace-related injuries round out the top four causes. And, of course, single, reproductive age men (ages 20-34 years old) are by far the most commonly affected.
I am reminded of these patients after a good friend, Dr. Stephen Seager, came over for dinner last week. A true Irish gentleman (“blended scotch before dinner and single malt after, no ice”) and world famous veterinarian, Dr. Seager invented the rectal probe electroejaculator in the early 1980s. I will leave it up to your imagination to wonder how this device works. But realize that this one doctor, through his invention and its popularization worldwide among male fertility specialists, has touched every spinal cord injured father from around the world over the past 30 years.
Seriously, the Seager Electroejaculator has revolutionized our ability to help men with spinal cord injury to conceive and become fathers. It takes advantage of the fact that ejaculation is governed by a spinal reflex (like sneezing) and it stimulates that reflex to happen. In fact, probably the only biological function that is not seriously affected in men who have broken their necks and cannot move any of their limbs (quadriplegic) is reproduction as this reflex generally remains intact.
By his innovative thinking, Dr. Seager brings hope to every spinal cord injured patient who dreams of being a father. Personally, seeing my patients with their little children running around their wheelchairs, and the wide, grateful smiles on their faces is easily one of the most satisfying experiences I have had in my medical career.
Tags: Assisted Reproduction, erections, fertility restoration, male infertility, men's health, paraplegia, quadriplegia, reproduction, sexual health, sperm count, spinal cord injury
Posted in male infertility, sexual health | No Comments »
Sunday, June 13th, 2010
China: 5000 years old and on the move.
Just got back from China, from Beijing and Hong Kong to be exact. I lectured to several medical and academic institutions on where I believe men’s health is headed in the future. What I found was an audience eager to push the research frontiers in this field, however I also a sensed a lack of sufficient infrastructure to do this at the highest level. I paused for a moment to think about what was possible, since a monumental tidal wave of increased industrial productivity and change is occurring in China. For example, there are 1000 new cars being put on the road daily in Beijing alone! I sensed that when the might of China’s intellectual potential directs its energy toward medical research and innovation, the world will stand in utter awe at the prodigious output that will result.
Despite the fact that China’s culture is endowed with 5000 years of evolution and is responsible for helping to define human civilization, one thing really surprised me: its decision in 1979 to control its population by mandating a “One Child Only” policy. In the rest of the world, human reproduction is a basic right and for the most part, entirely unregulated. Under China law, families are allowed to have one child. After that, a vasectomy is performed on the male partner. Like it or not.
In addition to great control of population growth, the “One Child Only” policy has also led to the development of the wildly successful “No Scalpel Vasectomy” procedure. Now relatively common in the U.S., the “No Scalpel Vasectomy” is a quicker (10 minute), cleaner, less invasive and more comfortable innovation on a 100-year old American procedure.
But the curse of the “No Scalpel Vasectomy” is now being felt in China. Currently, it is difficult to find enough youth to fill jobs in urban areas within the massive and burgeoning Chinese economy. As a consequence, there has been a softening of the law such that couples that are both products of “one child” parents can now have two children. So can farmers, handicapped couples, and couples who work in “high risk” occupations like coal mining, heavy equipment operations and the like.
Even more fascinating is that infertile couples have a real reproductive edge over fertile couples under this law. How? Well, if they need assisted reproduction to help them conceive and they happen to have twins or triplets as a result (a 30-40% chance), they are not penalized for bearing “extra” children. Can’t help but think that this little known fact may partly contribute to the size of the massive, bustling IVF clinics that I visited in China last week. many of which are 4-10 times the size of U.S. clinics.
Tags: Assisted Reproduction, babies, birth rates, contraception, fertility restoration, male infertility, male pill, men's health, no scalpel vasectomy, reproduction, sperm count, vasectomy, vasectomy reversal
Posted in men's health, sexual health | No Comments »
Sunday, May 2nd, 2010
This Da Vinci fetus is way past the critical window of exposure.
A relatively alarming study was published a couple of years ago that suggested that a pregnant woman’s behavior can determine the fertility of her unborn son. Sperm quality from 387 men was compared to beef consumption their mothers reported while pregnant with them. They found that the sons of “high beef consumers” (>7 beef meals/week) had sperm counts that were 24% lower than in men whose mothers ate less beef. Interestingly, sperm counts in the sons were not related to mother’s consumption of other meat or to the son’s consumption of meat. In essence, the author’s thought that estrogens in beef consumed by women may alter the testis development of their unborn sons and may adversely affect the son’s fertility. Similarly impressive decreases in semen quality have been described in the sons of women who smoked during pregnancy.
Sounds almost biblical, doesn’t it? I bring this up because of a point that I made in last week’s blog. In “The Curse of Women’s Urine,” I mentioned how xenoestrogens or environmental estrogens have been shown in animals to act at a very precise point in the developing male fetus and result in intersex conditions at birth or infertility as adults. Well, as the study of mothers’ beef intake reveals, the same issues may also exist in humans. As Aristotle once said: “At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law and justice he is the worst.”
Time for a quick lesson in biology. When do testicles develop in humans? Believe it or not, when male fetus in just 4 weeks old, the location where the future testis will be is organized (the urogenital ridge). Two weeks later, the primitive germ cells (sperm precursor cells) migrate to the urogenital ridge and set up what is to later become the testis. About 1-2 weeks after that, “sex cords” develop in the primitive testis, setting up the architecture of the mature organ. So, by 8-12 weeks of pregnancy, the human testis is virtually a complete organ, holding within it all of the potential it will ever have.
So the “critical window” of exposure for the human testis, that period in which even a potentially small exposure could wreak significant developmental and long lasting havoc, is about the time when women actually just realize that they are pregnant. The time of morning sickness and painful breasts.
So, does male infertility begin in the womb? Still not clear, really, as all studies have flaws. For example, in the study of beef eating pregnant women, the cohort of son’s whose sperm counts were so thoroughly examined were ALL fertile. That’s right, their wives were all pregnant. Oscar Wilde couldn’t have said it better when he said: “The pure and simple truth is rarely pure and never simple.”
Tags: Assisted Reproduction, azoospermia, babies, estrogens, evolution, genetics, male infertility, men's health, phytoestrogens, sexual health, sperm, sperm count, spermatogenesis, testicle, testosterone, xenoestrogens
Posted in men's health, sexual health | 4 Comments »
Sunday, April 25th, 2010
Estrogens and the manly man.
There must be something in the air… or water. The Bolivian President Evo Morales recently asserted publicly that hormones found in mass-produced foods are “feminizing” men. Speaking about chicken in Bolivia, which he believes are “loaded with feminine hormones,” he suggested that when men eat chicken “they are diverted from their nature as men.” So, is this how metrosexuals came to be?
But wait, the Vatican commented on this issue a year earlier, although they blamed female hormones from birth control pills for the increased estrogens in ground water. Pedro Castellvi, writing in the Vatican newspaper L’Osservatore Romano in 2009, stated: “we have sufficient data to affirm that one of the reasons for the not insignificant rise in male infertility in the west, is the environmental contamination caused by the pill.” Actually, it’s not the birth control pill itself but the urine from women taking the pill.
In fact, to date, the urine of women taking birth control pills has been blamed for worsening sperm counts in men, the growth of female sex organs in male fish, breast growth in young men and the early onset of puberty in young girls. What next?
Can I add a little balance to this discussion? First of all, exactly what is happening to men in Bolivia such that the President is not happy with them? Are they more civilized and less disruptive? Second, male infertility is not necessarily increasing in the western world; it may even be true that men have lower sperm counts now than a generation ago not because they are less fertile but because women are more fertile. Third, estrogens are found everywhere in the environment including in many plants (phytoestrogens) such as soy and legumes, and are not produced exclusively from the urine of women. Fourth, the intersex conditions that have been reported in many animal species tend to be caused by a very specific exposure at a very specific time point during fetal development and have been linked to pesticides, bisphenol A, dioxins and other environmental contaminants (xenoestrogens). Fifth, did we somehow forget about the worldwide obesity epidemic in humans and the fact that fat converts male hormones to female hormones? Lastly, there is little evidence that substantially increasing a man’s estrogen levels as an adult will dramatically alter anything, except maybe waist size and color preferences. Where the truth lies in all of this is currently unknown, but it is hard for me as a urologist to see how women’s urine could be blamed for so much.
Tags: birth control pills, birth rates, contraception, estrogens, evolution, male infertility, male pill, men's health, reproduction, sexual health, sperm count, testis cancer, women's health
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »
Sunday, April 4th, 2010
Did Warhol know about the "cola limit?"
How much coffee or tea do you consume everyday? Since many of us buy Slurpee sized cups of coffee in the morning, you should break those down into units of 8 ounce cups. How about cans of soda and in particular colas? Might be a good idea to keep track of this for a moment, as a recent study of 2,554 young Danish man has suggested that excessive cola intake could lead to lower sperm counts.
For comparison, the average young Danish military recruit consumes about 1 cup of coffee and 1 can of soda daily. This is in addition to about a half of cup of tea and 2 small chocolate bars (why not, Danish chocolate is yummy). This intake was associated with normal semen quality. However, the semen quality of young Danish men who consume more than 2 liters (2.1 quarts) of fizzy colas daily had a 30% less ejaculated sperm than men who drank no colas.
Interestingly, although colas are a weak source of caffeine (ounce for ounce, colas have 65% of the caffeine in coffee) there were no strong correlations between any amount of caffeine intake (even up to 7 cups of coffee a day!) and semen quality in these men. So, it is not likely that caffeine is the issue.
So what is the issue among those men who drink colas in excess? Well, the same issue as those who drink almost anything in excess—they have unhealthier lifestyles than those who consume in moderation. More burgers, more smoking, more alcohol, and fatter.
So, does drinking cola make men infertile? I doubt it, as the average sperm counts in men from all different levels of cola intake in the study were all normal by established fertility standards. Plus, fertility was not actually studied in these men, only a single semen sample. And even a good man can have a bad day.
There is a deeper truth running through this though. And you have heard this from me before. To be the best that you can be reproductively (and in life), do all things in moderation and treat your body like a temple.
Tags: alternative medicine, conception, male infertility, men's health, reproduction, sexual health, sperm, sperm count, testosterone
Posted in male infertility, men's health | 2 Comments »
Sunday, March 28th, 2010
Patients can handle the truth...try them.
How would you react to a doctor who, instead of explaining the entirety of your medical options, simply said “trust me, this is the right choice.” Maybe that style of “care” worked a generation or two back, but today’s patients have access to any piece of medical information that their doctors do. Patients want to know as much as they can so they can make the best choices for themselves or their loved ones.
Why do I bring this up? Well, because I got a call the other day from a patient who was seeking for more information about his options for fatherhood after vasectomy. He had an older vasectomy, 25 years or so, and a wife who was 40 years old. He met with two doctors in other cities and asked them about vasectomy reversal and sperm retrieval with assisted reproduction. Both of these are options for vasectomized men. Both urologists said, “forget it!” The patient was stunned. He just wanted information to help him decide how he was going to approach the family building issue. Instead, he received no information, and, without asking, he was told what he should do. Forget it.
Two things are still true after visiting these two doctors:
1. He still wants a family.
2. He knows no more than he did before about how to achieve this goal.
Now what is wrong with this picture? Patients do not necessarily depend on doctors for information; they can get that almost anywhere on the Web. However, they do depend on doctors for wisdom and knowledge–the interpretation of information as it applies to the patient. I believe that life is a journey, one that involves many forks in many roads. Some are chosen and others are not. In the end, there is a story, a memory, of the path that was taken. Making decisions about medical care is also part of the journey that we all take. As doctors, we are obliged to use our experience and wisdom to help patients face decisions and choices that affect their health, their budgets and often their very lives. A patient’s “trust” is earned and is not gifted to doctors. Be their trusted consultant, someone who they can rely on for good solid information and wisdom. Unlike what Col. Nathan R. Jessep says in A Few Good Men, patients can handle the truth.
In my discussion with this patient, I gave him the facts about each choice. Older vasectomies are less successful at being reversed than younger ones, but the results are still very respectable in the right hands. His wife’s age could influence his decision either way, especially if she has limited time left to have children. Pregnancies after reversals of older vasectomies occur later than those after younger vasectomies. Sperm retrieval and assisted reproduction
can be a faster, albeit more expensive, way to conceive. If more than one child is desired, then assisted reproduction can get very expensive compared to vasectomy reversal. No value judgments, just the facts. There are lots of ways to build families and patients armed with good informaton can decide which way is best for them.
It has always been my philosophy as a physician and surgeon to walk the walk with the patient. Even stepping into their shoes and taking the journey with them. This makes good sense in situations in which outcomes cannot be guaranteed. Sure, I will offer an opinion if they ask, “what would you do?” However, in my brief stay on this good earth, I have found that the educated consumer always makes the best choices.
Tags: Assisted Reproduction, azoospermia, babies, conception, female infertility, male infertility, no scalpel vasectomy, reproduction, sexual health, sperm count, vasectomy, vasectomy reversal
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
Sunday, March 21st, 2010
How damaged is your genetic sheet metal?
Imaging parking your car at home after work and all the nicks and scratches are removed while you sleep, before heading to work the next day. All shiny and new, polished even, while you sleep. Believe it or not, this is normally what happens to your genes and chromosomes on a minute-to-minute basis. DNA mismatch repair is a constant and vigilant process, occurring in all cells of the body. Why the biologic vigilance? Well, It keeps us whole, healthy and cancer free.
About 11 years ago, we published a paper showing for the first time that infertile men can’t repair the errors normally encountered in their DNA as well as normal men. This was startling news in part because it implied that infertile men may be more likely to develop other problems later in life, including cancer. Why cancer? Because the development of cancer has been associated with the inability to normally repair the frequent daily errors that occur to one’s DNA as the body’s cells divide and renew.
Today, however, we know much more. We know that testis cancer is 3-fold more likely to occur in previously infertile men than in fertile men as they age. And our latest research has shown that prostate cancer, thought to be a disease exclusive to older men, occurs more seriously and more commonly in previously infertile men.
So what does this mean? Is male infertility the first sign of a larger problem in our species? It is the ultimate medical problem of a species trying to reproduce? Well, honestly it isn’t entirely clear. However, to me it indicates that male infertility should certainly be considered an insurable and real medical condition that should be taken as seriously as a heart attack. Even more worrisome is the issue of whether the use of sperm from severely infertile men is putting their offspring at even higher risk of medical issues than that experienced by their fathers.
So do not ignore the infertility issue when it strikes and get that male partner evaluated by a specialist. Teach him to perform testicular self-examination, a simple maneuver performed once monthly in the shower that has far more potential to extend his life than even exercising or weight control. Educate him about prostate cancer so that he does not ignore the powerful screening tools available to find it early. The age of innocence is over. The warning signs are now clear; get men the care that they deserve.
Tags: cancer, evolution, genetics, male infertility, men's health, prostate cancer, reproduction, sexual health, sperm, sperm count, testis cancer
Posted in Prostate, male infertility, testis cancer | 7 Comments »
Sunday, March 7th, 2010
How about being happy and hopeful as well as healthy?
The couple had been trying to conceive for 5 years unsuccessfully. The tension and anxiety in the relationship was palpable and strained. They had spent well into the 5 digits to have a child with test tube baby technology (IVF) and yet were still not pregnant. His vasectomy reversal had also failed them. And they were going to try one more time, just once, with me, before calling it quits.
When he came to me for care, he was frankly depressed. Out of money and full of debt, close to losing his job in this economy and in a strained relationship hanging on by a thread, he sat across from me. He looked terrible. “Can you help?” he asked me.
Well I did help. I reversed his vasectomy again and it worked. Fast-forward 9 months and a birth announcement arrives in the office from the couple with a long personal note of thanks on the back. But one line really struck me:
”Looking at her, sleeping quietly, I see her future as an astronaut, the President, a doctor, a lawyer or anything else that she wants to be. She can be or do anything!”
Absolutely unbridled hope and enthusiasm was infusing a mind once filled with almost unfathomable despair. All this change, nine months and one baby ago. Wow!
Talk about a biological drive. Reproduction easily ranks up there with breathing and eating. Not for everyone of course, but for many. I am quite sure that if you surveyed infertile couples about their quality of life with infertility, as has been done in patients with cancer, you would find these diagnoses equally impactful. I have no doubt many of my patients would give up five healthy years of their life to have a child. Maybe even 10. Just because it cannot be assessed by a blood pressure cuff, a blood test, or a scar does not make infertility any less important an affliction.
And yet, despite its profound impact, its ability to tear apart relationships, crush self-esteem and slow down an otherwise productive couple to a grinding halt, infertility is not really considered a disease in many societies, including ours.
Want a more productive and healthier society? Cure infertility. And what about something else that this world could use a lot more of, as expressed by my patient: the resurrection of those elemental feelings that lead us to live good lives and to make the world a better place for those who will follow us.
Tags: Assisted Reproduction, azoospermia, conception, fertility restoration, male infertility, men's health, no scalpel vasectomy, reproduction, sexual health, sperm, sperm count, TESE, testicle, vasectomy, vasectomy reversal
Posted in male infertility, men's health | No Comments »
Sunday, February 28th, 2010
The best medicine for man is man...and good government
A couple sees a reproductive specialist for infertility. She gets a complete evaluation and he gets a semen analysis checked. It looks like his semen quality is low and they are recommended to pursue in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) to conceive, the highest level of what is termed “assisted reproduction.” They try this at significant expense and it fails. They try again and it fails again. At this point, the man sees a urologist and, after a proper physical examination, he is told that he has a testis mass and is diagnosed with testis cancer.
The point: Male infertility can be a symptom of another medical condition.
The question: What would have happened to this man if they had successfully conceived with IVF-ICSI?
This scenario is not all that uncommon in our field. And it is why I gladly accepted the invitation to go Washington D.C. and consult with the National Institute of Health (NIH) last fall regarding where government research monies should be spent in the future in the field of male reproductive health. At that meeting, I suggested that we start calling infertility a medical disease, just like any other, and get men the medical care that they deserve. I expect several great grant initiatives to stem from this gathering and was honored to have participated in it.
This scenario is also why I am excited to have been more recently invited to join the Medical Advisory Board of the Cooperative Reproductive Medicine Network at the National Institute for Child Health and Diseases (NICHD) at the NIH. The RMN, established in 1989, is a cooperative effort of seven universities and the government and is charged with conducting and publishing high quality clinical research studies in reproductive medicine. Thankfully, one of the areas of focus is on male infertility. So, I will be taking my “infertility as a disease” mantra to Washington quite a bit this year as I believe scenarios like the case outlined above should never happen in modern medicine.
Tags: alternative medicine, Assisted Reproduction, conception, male infertility, men's health, reproduction, sexual health, sperm, sperm count, testicle, testis cancer
Posted in male infertility, men's health | 1 Comment »
