Try It, You’ll Like It?

Paul Turek, MD — Mon, 07 May 2012 15:00:09 +0000

The pill that started it all in 1998.

As if it’s not top of mind anyway, here’s an update on the state of erection pills. Another one was just approved by the FDA and will hit the streets soon. Its name: Stendra (avanfil). Who names these drugs anyway?

The PDE5i Drugs

This new pill works similarly to the holy triumvirate of Viagra, Levitra and Cialis; it is a full-fledged member of the phosphodiesterase inhibitor (PDE5i) family. In essence, they are like taking coffee for the penis. Stendra is the first such pill to be approved in the last decade and it will certainly be interesting to see how it fares in this field of household giants.

What These Pills Do for You

You may be curious to try one of these pills, even if you don’t need it. You may even have thought to open that email spam folder that says “Bigger, Better, Badder” for quite some time. What can expect when you take these pills? Well, it depends on why you are taking it.

Goal: Trying it for Kicks

All pharmaceutical grade, FDA-approved pills share benefit and risk. The same is true for the PDE5i’s. If you don’t really need any help with your erection, this is termed “recreational use.” In fact, this is more common than you might think. It is estimated that 1 in 5 men ages 18-30 years have tried one of these erection pills for fun. But we know even more. Men claim that the pills prevent sexual failure and improve sexual performance and stamina. And, these pills tend to be used with other recreational drugs and alcohol that can decrease erections. More concerning however, is the well-defined association between illicit drugs, PDE5is and an increase in unsafe sexual behavior and increased HIV transmission.

In the simplest scenario, when they are taken in isolation by healthy young men, there may be a shorter latency period (“down time”) between ejaculation and the next erection. Others observe that the time to ejaculation can be extended.

But, for the most part, a normal erection is a normal erection and these pills would not be expected to offer much benefit to men who don’t really need them. In such cases, the common side effects of these medications such as headaches, facial flushing, nasal stuffiness, upset stomach may be more evident.

Goal: Trying it for Special Situations

Some men need a little help with erections. They may have normal erections at times but at other times, it’s not quite up to speed. This is termed situational erectile dysfunction. Whether it’s early in the relationship, associated with condom use or because of scheduled sex needed to conceive, the associated stress can be a killjoy. For these men, the PDE5is can be man’s best friend since 90-95% of men will recover normal, on-demand erections. Again, if the PDE5is are not really “needed” the side effect profile of these agents can be bothersome and limit their use.

Goal: Trying it Because You Need it

It is for men with true erectile dysfunction that these pills are intended. For those unable to achieve or maintain an erection, these pills are a holy grail. In fact, from 60-85% of men with erectile dysfunction will respond to the PDE5is as first line therapy, a great achievement for any pill. Unfortunately, men in this category may also have associated medical conditions such as diabetes, cholesterol imbalance or heart disease that make medical supervision of patients mandatory. In addition, other medications, including statins (cholesterol lowering) drugs, diltiazem, Zoloft and protease inhibitors to name a few, can interact with PDE5is and affect drug metabolism and produce, at times, life-threatening side effects. Clearly, doctors need to be involved in determining whether or not a patient should consider PDE5is for erectile dysfunction.

The reason these drugs are so popular is obvious. In the words of the self-help author Wayne Dyer, men fully realize that “miracles come in moments. Be ready and willing.”

For the Good of the Hood

Paul Turek, MD — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 05:06:59 +0000

Do you agree with the Ancients on the good of the hood?

To circumcise or not. A loaded subject to be sure. The practice of male circumcision is ancient, likely far older than the biblical account of Abraham in Genesis. The Jewish faith, but not that of the Greeks or Romans, routinely recommended circumcision of newborn males. In the past century, it became “medicalized” as a preventative procedure only to be debunked in the last decade. Well, it may be now a procedure on the rise once again.

Circumcision is the removal of some or all of the foreskin or prepuce from the penis. The august American Academy of Pediatrics continues to recommend that circumcision is medically unnecessary, that it lacks any proven benefit, and that it should not be performed routinely in neonates. Maybe that is why the incidence of neonatal circumcision in the U.S. has continued to decline, from 80% in the 1960’s to 60% in 1996, to 55% of boys in 2001.

Why should circumcision be avoided? Issues of neonatal pain, behavioral changes and the potential for loss of sexual sensitivity from removal of the prepuce are age-old arguments for its discontinuation. However, a military study showing that there is a higher rate of urinary tract infections (UTIs) in non-circumcised boys and the fact that penile cancer tends to occur almost exclusively in uncircumcised men has kept the procedure alive and well.

In a somewhat radical departure from earlier recommendations, public health officials are now arguing that circumcision of men is a key weapon in the fight against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in Africa. Three recent, large, controlled studies have shown that circumcision reduces infection rates by 50 to 60% among heterosexual African. These studies stem from 3 different parts of the continent: South Africa, Uganda, and Kenya. In fact, two of the three clinical trials were stopped early because of overwhelmingly positive results. Experts now estimate that more than 3 million lives could be saved in sub-Saharan Africa alone if the procedure becomes widely used. And there is more recent data showing that the incidence of Herpes virus and HPV (Human Papilloma Virus) may also be reduced in circumcised men.

How circumcision prevents HIV transmission is not completely understood, but it is believed that the foreskin acts as a reservoir for HIV-containing secretions, increasing the contact time between the virus and target cells in the foreskin.

The problem with HIV and circumcision is that it is much more than a simple “behavior-based” intervention and this may ultimately be its biggest obstacle to wide acceptance. Changing social mores and behavior is one thing, but the “cold, hard steel” aspect of this public health initiative may not survive in the long run. If you don’t live in Africa, a clean penis and a clean life may be all that’s needed to replace the knife.