Posts Tagged ‘men’s health’

Getting it Just Right

Sunday, April 18th, 2010
Caetano Veloso, a masterful, otherworldly voice and an eye on the potential of youth

Caetano Veloso, a masterful, otherworldly voice and an eye on the potential of youth

Had a wonderful evening out with my wife last night at a Caetano Veloso concert at Masonic Hall on Nob Hill in San Francisco. Caetano Veloso is Brazil’s equivalent of Frank Sinatra and is endowed with an absolutely otherworldly voice and reigns from Bahia. He is an historically important figure having led the Bossa Nova and Tropicalia movements in the late 1960’s. He plays it all: Jazz, pop, world beat, folk and ballad styles with an Ellingtonian understanding of harmonic richness.

As the Rolling Stone once said: “He’s a sublime and seductive melodist, a curious musician capable of taking sharp left turns, a historian whose compositions tie past and present together…at once upholding tradition and transcending it.” I have been a fan of his since the mid-1990’s, having seen him perform both in Brazil and in San Francisco. He is now 67 years old, and was simply outstanding again last night.

So how does one get this good? I think I discovered his secret last night, listening to him for the umpteenth time. In addition to his obvious musical gifts, he is at once historically grounded and very modern. And he is a fan of youth. His following remains a generation or two younger than he, and time and again he connects them to their past and to the future. It’s really a form of wisdom that he brings to music.

It is precisely this balance that I seek to achieve in the field of men’s health. Lets forget the stylistic aspects of Caetano Veloso that would be pretty difficult to match. But, bringing the wisdom of old fashioned medicine into the modern age has a certain timeless value. Making it a point not to forget that what has mattered in the doctor-patient relationship since the beginning of time, including trust, communication and empathy also still counts.  And leading the way with original and creative ideas that result in more innovative, efficient and personalized care is undoubtedly “modern.”

Caetano Veloso’s band is always filled with youthful musicians, all in their 20s or 30s. Surely he knows that youth have their ears to the ground and possess an uncanny sense of future…of their future.  Youth holds creativity, brilliance and fire, all forces strong enough to move mountains. Youths take paths that are characteristically unchartered, often “left turns,” and make decisions untainted and undaunted by experience. This all fits in nicely with my philosophy about taking care of men: “Want to take great care of men? Just listen to them.” I move with them just as I move with Caetano.

No Fizzy Colas in the Cathedral

Sunday, April 4th, 2010
Did Warhol know about the "cola limit?"

Did Warhol know about the "cola limit?"

How much coffee or tea do you consume everyday? Since many of us buy Slurpee sized cups of coffee in the morning, you should break those down into units of 8 ounce cups. How about cans of soda and in particular colas? Might be a good idea to keep track of this for a moment, as a recent study of 2,554 young Danish man has suggested that excessive cola intake could lead to lower sperm counts.

For comparison, the average young Danish military recruit consumes about 1 cup of coffee and 1 can of soda daily. This is in addition to about a half of cup of tea and 2 small chocolate bars (why not, Danish chocolate is yummy). This intake was associated with normal semen quality. However, the semen quality of young Danish men who consume more than 2 liters (2.1 quarts) of fizzy colas daily had a 30% less ejaculated sperm than men who drank no colas.

Interestingly, although colas are a weak source of caffeine (ounce for ounce, colas have 65% of the caffeine in coffee) there were no strong correlations between any amount of caffeine intake (even up to 7 cups of coffee a day!) and semen quality in these men. So, it is not likely that caffeine is the issue.

So what is the issue among those men who drink colas in excess? Well, the same issue as those who drink almost anything in excess—they have unhealthier lifestyles than those who consume in moderation. More burgers, more smoking, more alcohol, and fatter.

So, does drinking cola make men infertile? I doubt it, as the average sperm counts in men from all different levels of cola intake in the study were all normal by established fertility standards. Plus, fertility was not actually studied in these men, only a single semen sample. And even a good man can have a bad day.

There is a deeper truth running through this though. And you have heard this from me before. To be the best that you can be reproductively (and in life), do all things in moderation and treat your body like a temple.

Genome: Repair Thyself

Sunday, March 21st, 2010
How damaged is your genetic sheet metal?

How damaged is your genetic sheet metal?

Imaging parking your car at home after work and all the nicks and scratches are removed while you sleep, before heading to work the next day. All shiny and new, polished even, while you sleep. Believe it or not, this is normally what happens to your genes and chromosomes on a minute-to-minute basis. DNA mismatch repair is a constant and vigilant process, occurring in all cells of the body. Why the biologic vigilance?  Well, It keeps us whole, healthy and cancer free.

About 11 years ago, we published a paper showing for the first time that infertile men can’t repair the errors normally encountered in their DNA as well as normal men. This was startling news in part because it implied that infertile men may be more likely to develop other problems later in life, including cancer. Why cancer? Because the development of cancer has been associated with the inability to normally repair the frequent daily errors that occur to one’s DNA as the body’s cells divide and renew.

Today, however, we know much more. We know that testis cancer is 3-fold more likely to occur in previously infertile men than in fertile men as they age. And our latest research has shown that prostate cancer, thought to be a disease exclusive to older men, occurs more seriously and more commonly in previously infertile men.

So what does this mean? Is male infertility the first sign of a larger problem in our species? It is the ultimate medical problem of a species trying to reproduce?  Well, honestly it isn’t entirely clear. However, to me it indicates that male infertility should certainly be considered an insurable and real medical condition that should be taken as seriously as a heart attack. Even more worrisome is the issue of whether the use of sperm from severely infertile men is putting their offspring at even higher risk of medical issues than that experienced by their fathers.

So do not ignore the infertility issue when it strikes and get that male partner evaluated by a specialist. Teach him to perform testicular self-examination, a simple maneuver performed once monthly in the shower that has far more potential to extend his life than even exercising or weight control. Educate him about prostate cancer so that he does not ignore the powerful screening tools available to find it early. The age of innocence is over. The warning signs are now clear; get men the care that they deserve.

Stem Cells are People Too

Sunday, March 14th, 2010
A stem cell in a dish is worth a hundred different therapies.

A stem cell in a dish is worth a hundred different therapies.

Not all stem cells are alike. News to you? Maybe not, but it has hit researchers pretty hard over the past several weeks. As you may have garnered from prior essays on this blog, stem cells are potentially capable of morphing into many different tissues, such nerves, heart or liver, and are the next wave in medical therapy for all kinds of diseases affecting both the young and the old. The medical treatment that they will bring to the table is called “personalized, cell based therapy.”

One huge problem is that the best kind of stem cell, the one that can do the most, is created from embryos. The embryonic stem cell has many “issues” though: derived from embryos, retrieval ethics, not patient specific, created by cloning, inefficient to produce and the like. Because of this, research has focused on alternatives like transformed adult stem cells or our very own untransformed testicular stem cells. The news today concerns the quality of adult-type stem cells that are “reprogrammed” and transformed into embryonic-like stem cells, also termed induced pluripotency stem (iPS) cells.

Well, there appear to be growing pains for the iPS cell, an embryonic stem cell alternative. Developed in 2006 from adult skin cells, researchers genetically manipulated a specialized adult cell, transforming it back to an unspecialized state. Since then, hundreds of labs have leaped into the burgeoning adult stem cell field.

The ideal stem cell is like a blank slate. It is capable of becoming any other tissue, and is immortal. True embryonic stem cells are like this, but, according to several recent publications, many iPS cell lines are not really blank slates. Also, it appears that nerve and blood cells made from iPS cells grow poorly and age quickly and may even “remember” what cell from whence they came. Some even conclude that iPS cells may not even be considered a practical choice for cell-based therapy down the line.

The realization that iPS cells are not exactly like the gold standard embryonic stem cells has slowed the field down a bit, but it is an important observation. Like people or even wine, stem cells are a bit different from one another, each with their own personality, temperament and potential. Some do this better than that, and others do that better than this. It suggests that stem cell-based therapy may eventually involve tapping into a mixture of different stem cells to cure the problem. Now that’s an old fashioned idea: a little of this and a little of that…

Adding Hope to Health

Sunday, March 7th, 2010
How about being happy and hopeful as well as healthy?

How about being happy and hopeful as well as healthy?

The couple had been trying to conceive for 5 years unsuccessfully. The tension and anxiety in the relationship was palpable and strained. They had spent well into the 5 digits to have a child with test tube baby technology (IVF) and yet were still not pregnant. His vasectomy reversal had also failed them. And they were going to try one more time, just once, with me, before calling it quits.

When he came to me for care, he was frankly depressed. Out of money and full of debt, close to losing his job in this economy and in a strained relationship hanging on by a thread, he sat across from me. He looked terrible. “Can you help?” he asked me.

Well I did help. I reversed his vasectomy again and it worked. Fast-forward 9 months and a birth announcement arrives in the office from the couple with a long personal note of thanks on the back. But one line really struck me:

”Looking at her, sleeping quietly, I see her future as an astronaut, the President, a doctor, a lawyer or anything else that she wants to be. She can be or do anything!”

Absolutely unbridled hope and enthusiasm was infusing a mind once filled with almost unfathomable despair. All this change, nine months and one baby ago. Wow!

Talk about a biological drive. Reproduction easily ranks up there with breathing and eating. Not for everyone of course, but for many. I am quite sure that if you surveyed infertile couples about their quality of life with infertility, as has been done in patients with cancer, you would find these diagnoses equally impactful. I have no doubt many of my patients would give up five healthy years of their life to have a child. Maybe even 10. Just because it cannot be assessed by a blood pressure cuff, a blood test, or a scar does not make infertility any less important an affliction.

And yet, despite its profound impact, its ability to tear apart relationships, crush self-esteem and slow down an otherwise productive couple to a grinding halt, infertility is not really considered a disease in many societies, including ours.

Want a more productive and healthier society? Cure infertility. And what about something else that this world could use a lot more of, as expressed by my patient: the resurrection of those elemental feelings that lead us to live good lives and to make the world a better place for those who will follow us.

Good Job Government!

Sunday, February 28th, 2010
The best medicine for man is man...and good government

The best medicine for man is man...and good government

A couple sees a reproductive specialist for infertility. She gets a complete evaluation and he gets a semen analysis checked. It looks like his semen quality is low and they are recommended to pursue in vitro fertilization  (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) to conceive, the highest level of what is termed “assisted reproduction.” They try this at significant expense and it fails. They try again and it fails again. At this point, the man sees a urologist and, after a proper physical examination, he is told that he has a testis mass and is diagnosed with testis cancer.

The point: Male infertility can be a symptom of another medical condition.

The question: What would have happened to this man if they had successfully conceived with IVF-ICSI?

This scenario is not all that uncommon in our field. And it is why I gladly accepted the invitation to go Washington D.C. and consult with the National Institute of Health (NIH) last fall regarding where government research monies should be spent in the future in the field of male reproductive health. At that meeting, I suggested that we start calling infertility a medical disease, just like any other, and get men the medical care that they deserve. I expect several great grant initiatives to stem from this gathering and was honored to have participated in it.

This scenario is also why I am excited to have been more recently invited to join the Medical Advisory Board of the Cooperative Reproductive Medicine Network at the National Institute for Child Health and Diseases (NICHD) at the NIH. The RMN, established in 1989, is a cooperative effort of seven universities and the government and is charged with conducting and publishing high quality clinical research studies in reproductive medicine.  Thankfully, one of the areas of focus is on male infertility. So, I will be taking my “infertility as a disease” mantra to Washington quite a bit this year as I believe scenarios like the case outlined above should never happen in modern medicine.

Your DNA Barcode

Sunday, February 21st, 2010
Can we be DNA barcoded like a soup can in a grocery store?

Can we be DNA barcoded like a soup can in a grocery store?

How many of you would take a blood test to learn exactly how long you will live? How about whether or not you will become demented? Since the Human Genome Project ended, the genes and mutations associated with a vast array of diseases are being discovered daily and it is pretty easy to just put them on “chip” and make them available to the public.

Don’t get me wrong; gene testing already has already improved our lives. Such tests can clarify a diagnosis and better direct care, while others allow families to avoid having children with life-threatening or disabling conditions. They can be used to prevent disease before it happens, as with monitoring and removal of colon growths among those who have a gene for familial polyposis, and can diagnose common iron-storage diseases early enough to treat them and prevent them from becoming fatal. They can also help to positively identify murderers two decades after the crime.

One real problem is that many commercialized gene tests are targeted to healthy people who might be at high risk because of a strong family medical history for a disorder. Unfortunately, because of how complex we are as biological organisms, the tests give only a “probability” for developing the disorder. That means that some people who carry a mutation may never develop the disease. Another limitation is the possibility of laboratory errors. What this means is that the tests are not perfect and could be wrong.

And what happens to your job prospects and health (or life) insurance rates when it is learned through genetic testing that you might develop a significant disease? Well…nothing. Because of the federal GINA Law (Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act) passed in May 2008, insurance companies and employers cannot discriminate on the basis of information derived from genetic tests. So, genetics has now been added to the list of characteristics first embodied by the Civil Rights Act of 1964, that states that U.S. employers cannot discriminate according to race, color, national origin, sex, or religion. And this is good.

So, go ahead and take the “23 and Me” “DeCode” or “Navigenics” genomic screens if you so desire. Get to know your DNA barcode. Maybe you will get an idea of what may be around the corner for you. And maybe, just maybe, you will take better care of yourself knowing more about your genes. Just understand that many in the medical community feel that uncertainties surrounding test results, the current lack of available treatment options, the tests’ potential for provoking anxiety and social stigmatization could outweigh the benefits of testing. You know the saying: “Too much information…”

Metabolomics: The Picture of Fatherhood

Sunday, February 7th, 2010
Cellular metabolites: woven together like a rug

Cellular metabolites: woven together like a rug

Call me a nerd, but I have to admit that I am pretty excited about metabolomic technology. Uh, what? Metabolomics is the study of the chemical fingerprints that cells leave behind. It does not look at genes, DNA, RNA or proteins, but is a peek into the products or metabolites that result from all this genetic orchestration. It is a “physiological snapshot” of a living cell.

This past week, we published a study that applies metabolomics to male infertility. If you have been reading this column, you are well aware of my interest in helping sterile men become fathers. Over the last decade, it has become clear that many men with azoospermia (no ejaculated sperm) may have small pockets of sperm in the testicle. The question is how to safely find that sperm without causing undo harm to the testicle. Current methods for evaluating whether sperm are present include somewhat invasive techniques such as testicular biopsy and microdissection and less invasive ones such as FNA Sperm Mapping that I invented 13 years ago. However, as I always say, there is always room for improvement.

Wouldn’t it be nice to find the “pockets” of sperm in the testis through a simple scan and avoid a biopsy? Maybe even a scan that involves no radiation exposure, like an MRI? Well, that is precisely what we have developed in this study.

We showed that magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy can measure metabolic activity in the testis. And given that most metabolic activity in the testis is concentrated on building sperm (remember, normally men produce 1200 sperm/heartbeat!), metabolic measurements in the testis generally reflect sperm production. The study showed that the metabolomic scanning is as accurate as a more invasive testis biopsy in reading several abnormal patterns of sperm production typically associated with infertility. It also showed that testes that contain sperm carry a distinct chemical “signature” that can be distinguished by MR Spectroscopy.

How does it work? Essentially, the scan looks for chemicals in the testis that are the building blocks for sperm production. The theory is if you see a pile of bricks in the yard, then there is a good chance that a house is being built. In the study, phosphocholine was observed as one of the building-block chemicals in the testis. The more there is, the more likely sperm are being made.

Not only that, MR Spectroscopy can evaluate for sperm in as many as 100-200 areas within the testis, significantly increasing the ability to sample for sperm well beyond any of the more invasive techniques commonly used today.

Are we ready to replace a testis biopsy with an MRI scan? Not yet, but give me some time to tweak the system a bit and perform clinical trials comparing it to current approaches. My motivation runs deep, as I know that men would rather have their picture taken than have a surgical procedure to understand whether they can be fathers.

For the Good of the Hood

Sunday, January 31st, 2010
Do you agree with the Ancients on the good of the hood?

Do you agree with the Ancients on the good of the hood?

To circumcise or not. A loaded subject to be sure. The practice of male circumcision is ancient, likely far older than the biblical account of Abraham in Genesis. The Jewish faith, but not that of the Greeks or Romans, routinely recommended circumcision of newborn males. In the past century, it became “medicalized” as a preventative procedure only to be debunked in the last decade. Well, it may be now a procedure on the rise once again.

Circumcision is the removal of some or all of the foreskin or prepuce from the penis. The august American Academy of Pediatrics continues to recommend that circumcision is medically unnecessary, that it lacks any proven benefit, and that it should not be performed routinely in neonates. Maybe that is why the incidence of neonatal circumcision in the U.S. has continued to decline, from 80% in the 1960’s to 60% in 1996, to 55% of boys in 2001.

Why should circumcision be avoided? Issues of neonatal pain, behavioral changes and the potential for loss of sexual sensitivity from removal of the prepuce are age-old arguments for its discontinuation. However, a military study showing that there is a higher rate of urinary tract infections (UTIs) in non-circumcised boys and the fact that penile cancer tends to occur almost exclusively in uncircumcised men has kept the procedure alive and well.

In a somewhat radical departure from earlier recommendations, public health officials are now arguing that circumcision of men is a key weapon in the fight against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in Africa. Three recent, large, controlled studies have shown that circumcision reduces infection rates by 50 to 60% among heterosexual African. These studies stem from 3 different parts of the continent: South Africa, Uganda, and Kenya. In fact, two of the three clinical trials were stopped early because of overwhelmingly positive results. Experts now estimate that more than 3 million lives could be saved in sub-Saharan Africa alone if the procedure becomes widely used. And there is more recent data showing that the incidence of Herpes virus and HPV (Human Papilloma Virus) may also be reduced in circumcised men.

How circumcision prevents HIV transmission is not completely understood, but it is believed that the foreskin acts as a reservoir for HIV-containing secretions, increasing the contact time between the virus and target cells in the foreskin.

The problem with HIV and circumcision is that it is much more than a simple “behavior-based” intervention and this may ultimately be its biggest obstacle to wide acceptance. Changing social mores and behavior is one thing, but the “cold, hard steel” aspect of this public health initiative may not survive in the long run. If you don’t live in Africa, a clean penis and a clean life may be all that’s needed to replace the knife.

Getting There Early or On Time: Which is Better?

Sunday, January 24th, 2010
Is faster better? Not always.

Is faster better? Not always.

What is the most common sexual health problem affecting men? That’s easy, it’s erectile dysfunction, right? Nope. Try premature ejaculation. Hands down more common than erection issues, affecting 25-40% of men in the U.S.

Variably called early ejaculation, or early or rapid climax, it is defined as male ejaculation earlier than the subject or his partner desires. It used to be defined as ejaculation within 2 minutes of sexual intercourse, until it was realized that 75% of men ejaculate within 2 minutes in over half of their sexual encounters. What the definition really implies is that is some element of poor control over ejaculation that is stressful and may result in interpersonal difficulty.

Is this a medical disorder? In some cases, yes. Think of ejaculation as a reflex, like sneezing. There is a point of no return and this is what comes too soon in men with early ejaculation. The problem has two forms: lifelong and recent. The former is believed to result from low levels of the neurotransmitter serotonin (5HT) that normally modulates the ejaculation reflex. The recent form does not have as clear a biological basis, but may occur from psychological stress or from the need to overcome an erection problem.

The good news is that there are treatments available, and more treatments being reviewed by the FDA. Currently, the most effective treatments are pills called SSRIs, which elevate 5-HT levels and include anti-depressants such as Prozac, Zoloft, Celexa, and Lexapro. A newer form of SSRI drug, called Priligy, is now available in nine countries but has still not been FDA approved in the states. Also, a metered-dose aerosol spray has been developed to increase time to ejaculation by numbing the skin on the penis and decreasing sensation. Maybe this will help. Unfortunately, with all drug treatments for this condition, when the drugs are stopped, the issue generally returns.

What I find interesting is that companies are vigorously trying to drum up sympathy and attention for premature ejaculation as a widespread medical disorder, when in many cases it may be only an occasional annoyance that does not need constant treatment. Treatment might be perfect for a few men with debilitating disease, but it appears that they are trying to create and market a whole new category of disease. Good idea: create a “huge unmet need,” an epidemic that is perfect for a blockbuster, quality of life drug. Well what about a pill for shyness, or talking too fast? Where does it end? The larger issue here might be the “medicalization” of our daily lives in which there is a healthy and wide variation of normal.

Do I believe that some men have debilitating early ejaculation? You bet, and I see them every day. Do I think that a pill will treat this issue? Sure, for many, but only while you take it. Will blockbuster pills be the cure-all for early ejaculation? No way. The cure will come with more holistic treatment, by empowering men through behavioral changes that teach them to control and “own” the problem. Works superbly for my patients, pill or no pill.